SUMMER COURSES
Italian Neorealism Film Movement First Modern 
godard! 
By CLAUDIO CORDERO
(Director founder and editor of the magazine Saturday, December 11, 2010
Write A Thank You Note In Chinese
Summer Courses: Italian Neorealism "and" Hollywood forbidden "Appreciation
SUMMER COURSES
) SUMMER COURSES
The course examines-through exhibits and watching movies, the background of neo-realism, the historical context that gave birth to the movement, the impact of their major works and the artistic personality of their creators. sessions (8 in total) will be held Tuesday and Thursday in January, from 6 pm to 9 pm, starting on 04 January. The workshop is aimed at the general public. Limited vacancies.
For information and registration, call to 431-9079 or e-mail
For information and registration, call to 431-9079 or e-mail
:
cursos.godard @ gmail.com
FORBIDDEN HOLLYWOOD
The American Film Censorship Before By CLAUDIO CORDERO
(Director founder and editor of the magazine godard! )
immaculate image, which golden Hollywood developed two decades between 40 and 50 - has been severely criticized by historians who have pointed out how the filmmakers of the era had to circumvent the censors by innuendo and double meanings. From what has been said is less than the period covered since the beginning of sound until the appearance of the Hays Code, that is, before the studios decide to censor themselves to protect their economic interests. American films of that period is full of surprises and revelations, was bold and daring in its depiction of sexuality, social conflict, violence and other issues explosives that were to disappear from the screen until the late 60's. No taboos exist in the Hollywood of the early years, his films were adults and were not afraid to go big stars in compromising situations to good morals.
The course examines-through exhibits and watching movies, how was the Hollywood of that time, what was the speech that ran the studies, which films, directors and stars formed this short but fascinating chapter.
sessions (8 total) will be held Monday and Wednesday of January, from 6 pm to 9 pm, starting on 05 January. The workshop is aimed at the general public. Limited vacancies.
For information and registration, reported to 431-9079 or e-mail:
sessions (8 total) will be held Monday and Wednesday of January, from 6 pm to 9 pm, starting on 05 January. The workshop is aimed at the general public. Limited vacancies.
For information and registration, reported to 431-9079 or e-mail:
cursos.godard @ gmail.com
Friday, December 10, 2010
Mysore Mallige Hotfile
Statement on Passage of Law Procine
The Peruvian Association of Film Critics (appreciated) repudiates the approval, in plenary Congress, on Thursday 16 December, the bill introduced by Congressmen and Luciana León Carlos Raffo, arguing that this law, promoted by the distributors and exhibitors, favors mainly structural and economic interests of these corporations, pillars Hollywood tax system worldwide, and not sustained and autonomous development of the Peruvian cinema.
Adopted without a corresponding opinion in the Committee on Education and Culture, the law sacrifices the stability of financial contributions to Peruvian cinema, production and self-independent management of the private interests of these businesses, as well as the dignity of our sovereignty film.
Unfortunately, this law has been supported by some filmmakers, mostly, those grouped in the Association of Film Producers of Peru (APCP) - and has questioned the legitimacy of certain leaders within the guild movie Peruvian and its character as an anchor for the development of an activity involving professionals from different specialties throughout the country, not only in Lima.
outrage shared appreciation of the vast majority of national cinematography, and endorses the effort to make the presidency of the Republic observe this statute, which is a bad example that we hope will not be imitated in Latin American and Latin American environment , where Peru has official representation and allegedly discussed film policies for the growth of cinema in the region.
The Peruvian Association of Film Critics (appreciated) repudiates the approval, in plenary Congress, on Thursday 16 December, the bill introduced by Congressmen and Luciana León Carlos Raffo, arguing that this law, promoted by the distributors and exhibitors, favors mainly structural and economic interests of these corporations, pillars Hollywood tax system worldwide, and not sustained and autonomous development of the Peruvian cinema.
Adopted without a corresponding opinion in the Committee on Education and Culture, the law sacrifices the stability of financial contributions to Peruvian cinema, production and self-independent management of the private interests of these businesses, as well as the dignity of our sovereignty film. Unfortunately, this law has been supported by some filmmakers, mostly, those grouped in the Association of Film Producers of Peru (APCP) - and has questioned the legitimacy of certain leaders within the guild movie Peruvian and its character as an anchor for the development of an activity involving professionals from different specialties throughout the country, not only in Lima.
outrage shared appreciation of the vast majority of national cinematography, and endorses the effort to make the presidency of the Republic observe this statute, which is a bad example that we hope will not be imitated in Latin American and Latin American environment , where Peru has official representation and allegedly discussed film policies for the growth of cinema in the region.
13'' Portable Colour Tv Price
Editorial Godard! 26
Our main article Peruvian film called "An assessment of hope." We are aware of the paradox. To many colleagues and local filmmakers, the year end was a disaster, since none of the eight domestic release evoked the great majority. Even the most hyped of the litter - Counter , Javier Fuentes, was competition for
Our main article Peruvian film called "An assessment of hope." We are aware of the paradox. To many colleagues and local filmmakers, the year end was a disaster, since none of the eight domestic release evoked the great majority. Even the most hyped of the litter - Counter , Javier Fuentes, was competition for
of Hollywood blockbusters. 
is curious that our balance sheet last year ("La Teta Makes a Difference" -
godard!
N ° 22) has been much criticized. The reason? There manifestábamos, among other things, surprising "new voices who are more concerned with artistic expression in competition with the majors
.. " However, those who rejected this hypothesis Sanchopanza (and cried out: dignity for Peruvian cinema!) Are-going irony the first to complain, bitterly, and shed crocodile tears for the new business failure of Lombardi and Tamayo. These same experts try to convince us that the only reason that the masses have turned heatedly to a "false thriller" with Paul Vega and Mexican actress naked, or have not paid eighteen soles of your pocket to enjoy a "esoteric thriller" with Gianfranco Brero and a Peruvian actress naked, it is because the exhibitors and distributors simply do not feel like to support the national cinema. "Soon they will say the Harry Potter wand is designed to ward off the world of secret delights She , Illary and The Vigil ?
position godard! has been expressed in several editorials: we care about the quality of the movies, wherever they come from. And sorry, deeply, that almost always come from the same country. However, this is a reality that does not have to deprive the public of the orientation of the critics. And any political agenda, even just, should remove the press from its specific commitment. That said, do not pretend to be neutral or indifferent to the problems of an undeveloped film, and struggling to get ahead in the middle of the hegemony of Hollywood. On the other hand, is a known fact that, without state support, would close many doors to the filmmakers who attempted to engage in half so little cost in Peru. Therefore, our attention that a bill be known as the main beneficiaries, companies that control the movie business. And not, however, the Peruvian-film that we believe it must be supported, to have its own identity. Definitely the big multiplexes and large distribution companies do not need more financial aid than they already offer our detached Congress. Finally, we recommend, our filmmakers, who, if your goal is to seduce the Peruvian public, to reconsider the strategy to showcase their short films before Harry Potter and Narnia . Because without a coherent display criteria (do not pretend to be more relevant short films before the national long?, Would not it be more cohesive and competitive set a rule to select?) Will only that alienate the public. For most well-intentioned they are, they could become counterproductive taxation, especially for the same filmmakers.
position godard! has been expressed in several editorials: we care about the quality of the movies, wherever they come from. And sorry, deeply, that almost always come from the same country. However, this is a reality that does not have to deprive the public of the orientation of the critics. And any political agenda, even just, should remove the press from its specific commitment. That said, do not pretend to be neutral or indifferent to the problems of an undeveloped film, and struggling to get ahead in the middle of the hegemony of Hollywood. On the other hand, is a known fact that, without state support, would close many doors to the filmmakers who attempted to engage in half so little cost in Peru. Therefore, our attention that a bill be known as the main beneficiaries, companies that control the movie business. And not, however, the Peruvian-film that we believe it must be supported, to have its own identity. Definitely the big multiplexes and large distribution companies do not need more financial aid than they already offer our detached Congress. Finally, we recommend, our filmmakers, who, if your goal is to seduce the Peruvian public, to reconsider the strategy to showcase their short films before Harry Potter and Narnia . Because without a coherent display criteria (do not pretend to be more relevant short films before the national long?, Would not it be more cohesive and competitive set a rule to select?) Will only that alienate the public. For most well-intentioned they are, they could become counterproductive taxation, especially for the same filmmakers.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Crp High Ra High Esr High
Federico Trillo and Judge Garzón
The cynicism of this supernumerary of Opus Dei Federico Trillo is unlimited but is not satisfied with impunity, it also has the audacity to "fight" for get life imprisonment when he should be prosecuted for crimes as serious as homicide among other . But then transmit an article that reveals the background of the persecution of Trillo to Judge Garzon:
to a criminal organization, the figure of a judge Baltasar Garzon can be really uncomfortable. The sect Opus Dei is a criminal organization, it really would have reason to kill it. For starters, according to sociologist Alberto Moncada, that well known, "ALL THE MONEY OF OPUS DEI IS MONEY BLACK" and only a judge would need to investigate the provenance of their goods (which are disproportionate) and his statements to the public finances, to prosecute those most responsible for this sect. But this is not done in Spain, and I think a good question the reason for this shameful situation.
But economic crimes are not the only ones that consistently make this sect. We must also add, prevarication, coercion, threats , illegal detentions, kidnappings, incitement to suicide, murder, etc.. I am convinced that if the judiciary were serious about the law, they would means to investigate all crimes of Opus, giving himself a chain process where research would lead to new suspects, similarly to extended Gürtel case. Coming to the case
Gürtel've hit the key to this issue. why the judiciary has broken with their customs process to speed the suspension of Judge Garzón despite opposition from Attorney General? This question makes more sense if one considers that the Supreme Court has not accepted to process the 13,345 Aznar complaints or charges against the well-known member of Opus Dei Federico Trillo . While
Judge Garzon gave orders for the arrest of Pinochet, or investigating missing in Argentina, had no problems with the judiciary in Spain. Many praised him and I include myself among them, but I wondered why the Opus preseguía not in Spain. When Judge Garzon began investigating the case Gürtel, which has shown that they were involved so many members of the PP (the party of Opus) then the problems started with the judiciary. No less than three complaints were declared admissible against Judge Garzon filed precisely because far-right organizations in the field of Opus Dei. It is especially shameful that despite being admitted based on misrepresentations and even fraud.
In my opinion, it is clear that the sect Opus has control of the judiciary, and Judge Garzon is not the first judge who is a victim of corruption in the leadership of the Judiciary. For example, if the judge Esther Díez Blanca Marbella who after investigating a corruption case revealing that he had involved in the Supreme Judicial Council, far from the defendants pursued, it is judged it rather destroying the evidence obtained implicating the leadership of the judiciary, claiming to be obtained "illegally" and she was ordered suspended from office. Fortunately, years later recognized the injustice that was committed to her, but this unfortunate event, served to show the judges what can happen if there is research to "certain people". Thus, with the Opus in the judiciary, the rule of law is virtually relegated to a fallacy that no one in their right mind can accept. But English society lacks the means, apparently, to change this situation disgusting. 
The cynicism of this supernumerary of Opus Dei Federico Trillo is unlimited but is not satisfied with impunity, it also has the audacity to "fight" for get life imprisonment when he should be prosecuted for crimes as serious as homicide among other . But then transmit an article that reveals the background of the persecution of Trillo to Judge Garzon:
to a criminal organization, the figure of a judge Baltasar Garzon can be really uncomfortable. The sect Opus Dei is a criminal organization, it really would have reason to kill it. For starters, according to sociologist Alberto Moncada, that well known, "ALL THE MONEY OF OPUS DEI IS MONEY BLACK" and only a judge would need to investigate the provenance of their goods (which are disproportionate) and his statements to the public finances, to prosecute those most responsible for this sect. But this is not done in Spain, and I think a good question the reason for this shameful situation.
But economic crimes are not the only ones that consistently make this sect. We must also add, prevarication, coercion, threats , illegal detentions, kidnappings, incitement to suicide, murder, etc.. I am convinced that if the judiciary were serious about the law, they would means to investigate all crimes of Opus, giving himself a chain process where research would lead to new suspects, similarly to extended Gürtel case. Coming to the case
Gürtel've hit the key to this issue. why the judiciary has broken with their customs process to speed the suspension of Judge Garzón despite opposition from Attorney General? This question makes more sense if one considers that the Supreme Court has not accepted to process the 13,345 Aznar complaints or charges against the well-known member of Opus Dei Federico Trillo . While
Judge Garzon gave orders for the arrest of Pinochet, or investigating missing in Argentina, had no problems with the judiciary in Spain. Many praised him and I include myself among them, but I wondered why the Opus preseguía not in Spain. When Judge Garzon began investigating the case Gürtel, which has shown that they were involved so many members of the PP (the party of Opus) then the problems started with the judiciary. No less than three complaints were declared admissible against Judge Garzon filed precisely because far-right organizations in the field of Opus Dei. It is especially shameful that despite being admitted based on misrepresentations and even fraud.
In my opinion, it is clear that the sect Opus has control of the judiciary, and Judge Garzon is not the first judge who is a victim of corruption in the leadership of the Judiciary. For example, if the judge Esther Díez Blanca Marbella who after investigating a corruption case revealing that he had involved in the Supreme Judicial Council, far from the defendants pursued, it is judged it rather destroying the evidence obtained implicating the leadership of the judiciary, claiming to be obtained "illegally" and she was ordered suspended from office. Fortunately, years later recognized the injustice that was committed to her, but this unfortunate event, served to show the judges what can happen if there is research to "certain people". Thus, with the Opus in the judiciary, the rule of law is virtually relegated to a fallacy that no one in their right mind can accept. But English society lacks the means, apparently, to change this situation disgusting.
Phils Importation Requirements For Sail Boat
A web of corruption caused the death of the Yak-42 military
The following article discusses and critiques among other things, the web of corruption in the ministry headed by the well-known member of Opus Dei Federico Trillo, who curiously has not only resigned his seat as a deputy but also has been appointed spokesman for Justice PP. This gesture proves the power of Opus in the RFP. But not only that, also in the judiciary.
is not the first time the sect Opus is involved in corruption scandals about the money. From the beginning, was noted for his excessive and suspicious interest in money, which also seeks fraudulently. According to sociologist Alberto Moncada, who knows, "ALL THE MONEY OF OPUS DEI IS MONEY BLACK" , and just remember the case Matesa , Rumasa case, among many others. The most recent case is gürtel case which demonstrates the great corruption of PP when is public money. On the relationship between the sect Opus and the PP view article The sect Opus and PP. Then an article on corruption in the Ministry headed by Trillo.
"A web of corruption caused the death of the Yak-42 military." Such confidence is the Wyoming article today about this event, in his regular column for Audience, which explains that "the money for the military transport magically disappeared, so that by the above Flight Defence Ministry paid 149,000 euros for the company only charged 38,422. They took the pasta, "writes also host of TV's The Intermediate.
The remaining money
"The soldiers were traveling in conditions of flight infamous luxury price," writes Wyoming, which states that the Ministry of Defence, the head of which was the then Minister Federico Trillo " paid 149,000 euros, although the airline "took only 38,422."
Marlaska Judge
Wyoming judge points. "Mr. Marlaska, who judged the issue after several attempts to file and to resist the evidence Turkish experts to testify at the trial - why? - not found responsible, waived the other people named by the parties because they were not "guarantors of security due to English military transport." Apparently, the soldiers were traveling on a whim and under his responsibility, "says the writer ironically.
In my opinion the judge Malarska should be tried for graft and undue delay. But the sect Opus, at the top of the judiciary, is more interested in prosecuting Judge Garzon for his good work in the investigation into the plot in prosecuting Gürtel Trillo and Malarska among others. 
The following article discusses and critiques among other things, the web of corruption in the ministry headed by the well-known member of Opus Dei Federico Trillo, who curiously has not only resigned his seat as a deputy but also has been appointed spokesman for Justice PP. This gesture proves the power of Opus in the RFP. But not only that, also in the judiciary.
is not the first time the sect Opus is involved in corruption scandals about the money. From the beginning, was noted for his excessive and suspicious interest in money, which also seeks fraudulently. According to sociologist Alberto Moncada, who knows, "ALL THE MONEY OF OPUS DEI IS MONEY BLACK" , and just remember the case Matesa , Rumasa case, among many others. The most recent case is gürtel case which demonstrates the great corruption of PP when is public money. On the relationship between the sect Opus and the PP view article The sect Opus and PP. Then an article on corruption in the Ministry headed by Trillo.
"A web of corruption caused the death of the Yak-42 military." Such confidence is the Wyoming article today about this event, in his regular column for Audience, which explains that "the money for the military transport magically disappeared, so that by the above Flight Defence Ministry paid 149,000 euros for the company only charged 38,422. They took the pasta, "writes also host of TV's The Intermediate.
The remaining money
"The soldiers were traveling in conditions of flight infamous luxury price," writes Wyoming, which states that the Ministry of Defence, the head of which was the then Minister Federico Trillo " paid 149,000 euros, although the airline "took only 38,422."
Marlaska Judge
Wyoming judge points. "Mr. Marlaska, who judged the issue after several attempts to file and to resist the evidence Turkish experts to testify at the trial - why? - not found responsible, waived the other people named by the parties because they were not "guarantors of security due to English military transport." Apparently, the soldiers were traveling on a whim and under his responsibility, "says the writer ironically.
In my opinion the judge Malarska should be tried for graft and undue delay. But the sect Opus, at the top of the judiciary, is more interested in prosecuting Judge Garzon for his good work in the investigation into the plot in prosecuting Gürtel Trillo and Malarska among others.
Best Brazilian Wax Santa Barbara
Letter to the Prime Minister of Spain
The above is an excerpt from a letter from another victim of the Opus Dei addressed to the English Prime Minister Mr Zapatero for protection, where it is exposed and provides a reality testiminio Opus as a victim.
Ramon Martinez Robles, a English citizen, DNI 74712641, born in Granada, Spain on October 21, 1959, by profession a secondary school teacher and resident in Stockholm, Sweden, states:
In June 1988 Judge Grenada, known as the Opus or friend authorized me admitted to a psychiatric ward of a writ and a certificate content address that gave false apparent competition, among other irregularities.
Initially I was defended by court-appointed lawyers to the evidence and seriousness of the crimes, but all prosecutors and judges who heard the case was always told that there was no evidence of a crime as you can clearly see that I can prove. Upon reaching the internal ultimately the Constitutional Court, with the cooperation of prosecutors and the General Bar Council, I rejected the public defender who was entitled by law and by a resolution that did not have standing to appeal, place to turn and the corresponding period, closed the case.
In this situation, I realized that any judge of Opus illegally could penetrate with impunity, and seeing the Opus dared to act with such arrogance in the government of the PSOE, and as I was watching that come with their lies and machinations going to get win the election, I had no choice but to exile. I chose Sweden, not being a Catholic country and the good image regarding human rights and good action of Swedish socialism led by Olof Palme.
Unfortunately, upon arrival in Sweden told me that in Sweden there are some powers that dominate the state similar to the Opus in Spain, and that everything indicates that these powers were responsible of his murder as well as the recently assassinated Foreign Minister Anna socialist Lind. For this reason I feel in danger here in Sweden and I will explain the reasons why the protection of the government request that you represent, and the crimes that I can not prove if I give her protection.
come from a traditional Catholic family rights. Although they were not a principle of Opus, it seems that thanks to my brother who married a woman where all their parents and brothers were members of Opus, remained so they also ended. Because since I was 14 I was always an atheist and openly expressing my opinion on that religion and mythology was only the Catholic Church was a fraud (not to forget the subject of miracles, the lush richness of the Pope, etc, etc) is open stance caused me many problems with my parents, things got worse when the Opus to my house. Then my parents and brothers began to talk about me behind my back whispering, and said I was crazy. In addition, people who did not know anything, began to harass me on the street, with insults and even aggression. One day I was taken by deception to a private clinic in Granada was called the Immaculate I remember, and force me bedridden. Do not know what I did there, but the fact is that I started feeling voices head telling me things like "you going to know what the work" "We're going to intern in a mental hospital" everything you do will be for us, "" ashamed, is as pigs have to kill to eat us, "etc. etc.
Shortly later I was forcibly committed to a psychiatric center in an illegal way as you can see if you read the documentation that I send. Although the psychiatrist who was on duty and that he acknowledged me the night I was admitted (which clearly was not the Opus) wrote that I looked so scared but no disorder of interest and to rule out schizophrenia, the psychiatrist who was the next day that was Opus, wrote to me what I wanted, I was forcibly medicated psychomotor and cause dizziness after 10 days I leave without court approval under the constraint of following a treatment that clearly hurt me.
When I reached out to media, newspapers, got complaints at all levels of state, etc, etc. But they were insulted and threatened in my head. Given the many complaints that sent them, heard them say "we'll have to tell them not to heed him." Also they said "you know what the ban from the authorities?" In this way seems to me they meant which version they would give would prevail given the evidence of crimes that I supplied. They talked about the law as a matter of fools who believe and the state as something that was on your property. The
've been listening every day from when I wake up I go to bed since 1988. Sometimes when I awake, I listen to: "start recording already awake."
When I arrived in Sweden, besides the usual I used to hear in my head, I began to hear new people who spoke English with an accent. Today I listen to Swedish. Here in Sweden I found out that already in the 60's, the Swedish police in collaboration with health authorities, electronics implataba in brains of people involuntarily. When I read this, I called the Medical Ethics Council here in Stockholm, they confirmed it was true, but denied that these practices hiciesen today. The truth is that the symptoms of these victims is that they have voices in your head, and the murderer of Anna Lind, complained of having voices in your head, what makes me think of a clear political assassination, probably by the same who killed Olof Palme.Por is why I am also in danger in Sweden, as the authorities allow torture and humiliate me continuously English Swedish and Opus, and I wonder Opus relationship with these people in Sweden. Therefore, we ask for protection to his government.
is the use of a technology developed here in Sweden since the 60's. Find abundant information on the link: NEUROBIOLOGY
criminal complaint against the English Supreme Court Justices
TEST DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED IN THE COMPLAINT
Additionally, more information on neuroscience:
NEUROSCIENCE AND POWER 
The above is an excerpt from a letter from another victim of the Opus Dei addressed to the English Prime Minister Mr Zapatero for protection, where it is exposed and provides a reality testiminio Opus as a victim.
Ramon Martinez Robles, a English citizen, DNI 74712641, born in Granada, Spain on October 21, 1959, by profession a secondary school teacher and resident in Stockholm, Sweden, states:
In June 1988 Judge Grenada, known as the Opus or friend authorized me admitted to a psychiatric ward of a writ and a certificate content address that gave false apparent competition, among other irregularities.
Initially I was defended by court-appointed lawyers to the evidence and seriousness of the crimes, but all prosecutors and judges who heard the case was always told that there was no evidence of a crime as you can clearly see that I can prove. Upon reaching the internal ultimately the Constitutional Court, with the cooperation of prosecutors and the General Bar Council, I rejected the public defender who was entitled by law and by a resolution that did not have standing to appeal, place to turn and the corresponding period, closed the case.
In this situation, I realized that any judge of Opus illegally could penetrate with impunity, and seeing the Opus dared to act with such arrogance in the government of the PSOE, and as I was watching that come with their lies and machinations going to get win the election, I had no choice but to exile. I chose Sweden, not being a Catholic country and the good image regarding human rights and good action of Swedish socialism led by Olof Palme.
Unfortunately, upon arrival in Sweden told me that in Sweden there are some powers that dominate the state similar to the Opus in Spain, and that everything indicates that these powers were responsible of his murder as well as the recently assassinated Foreign Minister Anna socialist Lind. For this reason I feel in danger here in Sweden and I will explain the reasons why the protection of the government request that you represent, and the crimes that I can not prove if I give her protection.
come from a traditional Catholic family rights. Although they were not a principle of Opus, it seems that thanks to my brother who married a woman where all their parents and brothers were members of Opus, remained so they also ended. Because since I was 14 I was always an atheist and openly expressing my opinion on that religion and mythology was only the Catholic Church was a fraud (not to forget the subject of miracles, the lush richness of the Pope, etc, etc) is open stance caused me many problems with my parents, things got worse when the Opus to my house. Then my parents and brothers began to talk about me behind my back whispering, and said I was crazy. In addition, people who did not know anything, began to harass me on the street, with insults and even aggression. One day I was taken by deception to a private clinic in Granada was called the Immaculate I remember, and force me bedridden. Do not know what I did there, but the fact is that I started feeling voices head telling me things like "you going to know what the work" "We're going to intern in a mental hospital" everything you do will be for us, "" ashamed, is as pigs have to kill to eat us, "etc. etc.
Shortly later I was forcibly committed to a psychiatric center in an illegal way as you can see if you read the documentation that I send. Although the psychiatrist who was on duty and that he acknowledged me the night I was admitted (which clearly was not the Opus) wrote that I looked so scared but no disorder of interest and to rule out schizophrenia, the psychiatrist who was the next day that was Opus, wrote to me what I wanted, I was forcibly medicated psychomotor and cause dizziness after 10 days I leave without court approval under the constraint of following a treatment that clearly hurt me.
When I reached out to media, newspapers, got complaints at all levels of state, etc, etc. But they were insulted and threatened in my head. Given the many complaints that sent them, heard them say "we'll have to tell them not to heed him." Also they said "you know what the ban from the authorities?" In this way seems to me they meant which version they would give would prevail given the evidence of crimes that I supplied. They talked about the law as a matter of fools who believe and the state as something that was on your property. The
've been listening every day from when I wake up I go to bed since 1988. Sometimes when I awake, I listen to: "start recording already awake."
When I arrived in Sweden, besides the usual I used to hear in my head, I began to hear new people who spoke English with an accent. Today I listen to Swedish. Here in Sweden I found out that already in the 60's, the Swedish police in collaboration with health authorities, electronics implataba in brains of people involuntarily. When I read this, I called the Medical Ethics Council here in Stockholm, they confirmed it was true, but denied that these practices hiciesen today. The truth is that the symptoms of these victims is that they have voices in your head, and the murderer of Anna Lind, complained of having voices in your head, what makes me think of a clear political assassination, probably by the same who killed Olof Palme.Por is why I am also in danger in Sweden, as the authorities allow torture and humiliate me continuously English Swedish and Opus, and I wonder Opus relationship with these people in Sweden. Therefore, we ask for protection to his government.
is the use of a technology developed here in Sweden since the 60's. Find abundant information on the link: NEUROBIOLOGY
criminal complaint against the English Supreme Court Justices
TEST DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED IN THE COMPLAINT
Additionally, more information on neuroscience:
NEUROSCIENCE AND POWER
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)