The cynicism of this supernumerary of Opus Dei Federico Trillo is unlimited but is not satisfied with impunity, it also has the audacity to "fight" for get life imprisonment when he should be prosecuted for crimes as serious as homicide among other . But then transmit an article that reveals the background of the persecution of Trillo to Judge Garzon:
to a criminal organization, the figure of a judge Baltasar Garzon can be really uncomfortable. The sect Opus Dei is a criminal organization, it really would have reason to kill it. For starters, according to sociologist Alberto Moncada, that well known, "ALL THE MONEY OF OPUS DEI IS MONEY BLACK" and only a judge would need to investigate the provenance of their goods (which are disproportionate) and his statements to the public finances, to prosecute those most responsible for this sect. But this is not done in Spain, and I think a good question the reason for this shameful situation.
But economic crimes are not the only ones that consistently make this sect. We must also add, prevarication, coercion, threats , illegal detentions, kidnappings, incitement to suicide, murder, etc.. I am convinced that if the judiciary were serious about the law, they would means to investigate all crimes of Opus, giving himself a chain process where research would lead to new suspects, similarly to extended Gürtel case. Coming to the case
Gürtel've hit the key to this issue. why the judiciary has broken with their customs process to speed the suspension of Judge Garzón despite opposition from Attorney General? This question makes more sense if one considers that the Supreme Court has not accepted to process the 13,345 Aznar complaints or charges against the well-known member of Opus Dei Federico Trillo . While
Judge Garzon gave orders for the arrest of Pinochet, or investigating missing in Argentina, had no problems with the judiciary in Spain. Many praised him and I include myself among them, but I wondered why the Opus preseguía not in Spain. When Judge Garzon began investigating the case Gürtel, which has shown that they were involved so many members of the PP (the party of Opus) then the problems started with the judiciary. No less than three complaints were declared admissible against Judge Garzon filed precisely because far-right organizations in the field of Opus Dei. It is especially shameful that despite being admitted based on misrepresentations and even fraud.
In my opinion, it is clear that the sect Opus has control of the judiciary, and Judge Garzon is not the first judge who is a victim of corruption in the leadership of the Judiciary. For example, if the judge Esther Díez Blanca Marbella who after investigating a corruption case revealing that he had involved in the Supreme Judicial Council, far from the defendants pursued, it is judged it rather destroying the evidence obtained implicating the leadership of the judiciary, claiming to be obtained "illegally" and she was ordered suspended from office. Fortunately, years later recognized the injustice that was committed to her, but this unfortunate event, served to show the judges what can happen if there is research to "certain people". Thus, with the Opus in the judiciary, the rule of law is virtually relegated to a fallacy that no one in their right mind can accept. But English society lacks the means, apparently, to change this situation disgusting.
0 comments:
Post a Comment