Editorial Godard! 26
Our main article Peruvian film called "An assessment of hope." We are aware of the paradox. To many colleagues and local filmmakers, the year end was a disaster, since none of the eight domestic release evoked the great majority. Even the most hyped of the litter - Counter , Javier Fuentes, was competition for
Friday, December 10, 2010
of Hollywood blockbusters. 
is curious that our balance sheet last year ("La Teta Makes a Difference" -
godard!
N ° 22) has been much criticized. The reason? There manifestábamos, among other things, surprising "new voices who are more concerned with artistic expression in competition with the majors
.. " However, those who rejected this hypothesis Sanchopanza (and cried out: dignity for Peruvian cinema!) Are-going irony the first to complain, bitterly, and shed crocodile tears for the new business failure of Lombardi and Tamayo. These same experts try to convince us that the only reason that the masses have turned heatedly to a "false thriller" with Paul Vega and Mexican actress naked, or have not paid eighteen soles of your pocket to enjoy a "esoteric thriller" with Gianfranco Brero and a Peruvian actress naked, it is because the exhibitors and distributors simply do not feel like to support the national cinema. "Soon they will say the Harry Potter wand is designed to ward off the world of secret delights She , Illary and The Vigil ?
position godard! has been expressed in several editorials: we care about the quality of the movies, wherever they come from. And sorry, deeply, that almost always come from the same country. However, this is a reality that does not have to deprive the public of the orientation of the critics. And any political agenda, even just, should remove the press from its specific commitment. That said, do not pretend to be neutral or indifferent to the problems of an undeveloped film, and struggling to get ahead in the middle of the hegemony of Hollywood. On the other hand, is a known fact that, without state support, would close many doors to the filmmakers who attempted to engage in half so little cost in Peru. Therefore, our attention that a bill be known as the main beneficiaries, companies that control the movie business. And not, however, the Peruvian-film that we believe it must be supported, to have its own identity. Definitely the big multiplexes and large distribution companies do not need more financial aid than they already offer our detached Congress. Finally, we recommend, our filmmakers, who, if your goal is to seduce the Peruvian public, to reconsider the strategy to showcase their short films before Harry Potter and Narnia . Because without a coherent display criteria (do not pretend to be more relevant short films before the national long?, Would not it be more cohesive and competitive set a rule to select?) Will only that alienate the public. For most well-intentioned they are, they could become counterproductive taxation, especially for the same filmmakers.
position godard! has been expressed in several editorials: we care about the quality of the movies, wherever they come from. And sorry, deeply, that almost always come from the same country. However, this is a reality that does not have to deprive the public of the orientation of the critics. And any political agenda, even just, should remove the press from its specific commitment. That said, do not pretend to be neutral or indifferent to the problems of an undeveloped film, and struggling to get ahead in the middle of the hegemony of Hollywood. On the other hand, is a known fact that, without state support, would close many doors to the filmmakers who attempted to engage in half so little cost in Peru. Therefore, our attention that a bill be known as the main beneficiaries, companies that control the movie business. And not, however, the Peruvian-film that we believe it must be supported, to have its own identity. Definitely the big multiplexes and large distribution companies do not need more financial aid than they already offer our detached Congress. Finally, we recommend, our filmmakers, who, if your goal is to seduce the Peruvian public, to reconsider the strategy to showcase their short films before Harry Potter and Narnia . Because without a coherent display criteria (do not pretend to be more relevant short films before the national long?, Would not it be more cohesive and competitive set a rule to select?) Will only that alienate the public. For most well-intentioned they are, they could become counterproductive taxation, especially for the same filmmakers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment